Methodology. Output value = points produced per active start at each lineup slot.
Replacement value uses a bottom-3 starter weekly baseline per NFL position (avoids
injury-week noise). What-if scenarios rebuild the optimal lineup from each team's
actual roster under each alternate template — this strips out owner start/sit luck so the
template effect is the only thing changing.
League context. The lineup template already changed in 2025: the dedicated TE slot was
dropped and replaced with a second FLEX (RB/WR/TE). This report measures the impact of that change and
explores four further alternatives the league can discuss.
2025 — Output Value by Lineup Slot
Active starts only · sorted by avg PPG · ranges show min / p25 / median / p75 / max
What this is: how many fantasy points each lineup slot actually produced per week in 2025. A high avg means that slot reliably drives team scoring; a low avg means it's a roster filler. The range chart shows predictability — narrow ranges are consistent contributors, wide ranges are boom-or-bust. Ask: are K and D/ST still pulling their weight relative to flex players?
QB
highest avg slot
25.0
avg PPG (QB)
RB/WR/TE
lowest avg slot
6.5
avg PPG (RB/WR/TE)
Reading the table. Starts = number of player-weeks that slot was active. p10 / p90 = the floor and ceiling — 10% of starts scored below p10, 10% scored above p90 — so the gap between them shows how wide the slot's outcomes are. Std Dev is the typical spread around the average (low = predictable, high = boom-or-bust). Negative Min values are real ESPN outcomes (INTs, fumbles, missed FGs).
| Slot | Starts | Avg | Median | Std Dev | p10 | p90 | Max | Min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QB | 186 | 25.0 | 25.2 | 12.8 | 8.4 | 41.6 | 57.7 | -1.7 |
| D/ST | 187 | 12.6 | 11.0 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 23.0 | 39.5 | 0.0 |
| K | 187 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 16.0 | 26.0 | -1.0 |
| RB | 374 | 8.8 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 1.6 | 20.6 | 39.3 | -1.7 |
| WR | 374 | 7.2 | 5.2 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 16.1 | 30.6 | -1.4 |
| RB/WR/TE | 374 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 15.8 | 28.3 | -2.1 |
Trend — Avg PPG by Slot (2021–2025)
Tracks how each slot's per-week scoring has shifted over the last five seasons.
What this is: year-over-year shift in each slot's per-week scoring. A flat line means stable value; a sloping line means the position is gaining or losing importance over time. Watch K and D/ST especially — if their lines trend down while flex trends up, the case for dropping them gets stronger each year. Trends are more reliable than any single season because they smooth out hot/cold years.
| Slot | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QB | 26.4 | 27.0 | 27.6 | 25.4 | 27.5 | 25.0 |
| RB | 8.4 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| WR | 7.6 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.6 | 7.2 |
| TE | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 5.5 | — |
| RB/WR/TE | 6.5 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 6.5 |
| K | 7.9 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| D/ST | 12.1 | 11.8 | 10.6 | 12.3 | 11.4 | 12.6 |
All-Time — Output Value by Slot (2021–2025)
Aggregated over all five seasons. TE is included even though 2025 removed its dedicated slot.
What this is: the same per-slot scoring metric, aggregated across all five seasons for a more stable baseline. Std Dev is week-to-week spread — low = predictable, high = volatile. The dedicated TE row is kept so you can compare its old-slot output to what flex absorbs now. Treat all-time as 'what these slots do on average' and the 2025 table above as 'what they're doing right now.'
Reading the table. Starts = number of player-weeks across all five seasons. p10 / p90 = the floor and ceiling (10% of starts scored below / above these). Std Dev measures week-to-week volatility (low = predictable). Negative Min values are real ESPN outcomes (INTs, fumbles, missed FGs).
| Slot | Starts | Avg | Median | Std Dev | p10 | p90 | Max | Min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QB | 1,133 | 26.5 | 26.0 | 12.8 | 11.0 | 43.6 | 67.0 | -1.7 |
| D/ST | 1,135 | 11.8 | 10.5 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 22.5 | 49.0 | -5.0 |
| K | 1,135 | 8.6 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 15.0 | 28.0 | -4.0 |
| RB | 2,270 | 8.1 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 0.9 | 17.6 | 43.2 | -1.7 |
| WR | 2,269 | 7.5 | 5.1 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 17.4 | 41.3 | -1.4 |
| RB/WR/TE | 1,322 | 6.7 | 4.5 | 6.2 | 0.3 | 15.9 | 41.3 | -2.1 |
| TE | 948 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 0.3 | 12.1 | 35.3 | -1.4 |
2025 — Position Scarcity (VORP)
Baseline = bottom-3 active starters at the position each week, averaged across the season.
Scarcity gap = top-12 avg − baseline avg. It's the every-week edge you get from owning an elite player at that position instead of a replacement-level one. Big gap = scarce, draft early. Small gap = replaceable, stream from waivers. Note: compare same-start-count positions (QB to K to D/ST) most confidently — RB/WR baselines are noisier because more players start at those spots league-wide.
QB
biggest scarcity gap
17.6
top-12 vs baseline (ppg)
TE
smallest gap
2.6
top-12 vs baseline (ppg)
Reading the table. Top-3 Avg / Top-12 Avg = avg PPG of the best 3 and 12 starters at that position. Baseline = the bottom-3 starters per week (replacement level). Scarcity Gap = Top-12 − Baseline — the every-week edge from owning an elite player there. Players Qualified = count with at least 5 starts.
| Pos | Top-3 Avg | Top-12 Avg | Baseline (bottom-3) | Scarcity Gap | Players Qualified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QB | 33.1 | 28.0 | 10.4 | 17.6 | 14 |
| RB | 14.2 | 11.7 | 0.8 | 10.8 | 40 |
| WR | 11.7 | 10.0 | 0.3 | 9.8 | 48 |
| D/ST | 15.3 | 13.4 | 5.2 | 8.2 | 17 |
| K | 11.8 | 9.7 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 13 |
| TE | 8.9 | 6.5 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 7 |
All-Time Scarcity (2021–2025)
Same metric averaged across all five seasons. Stable scarcity ranking = stable draft priority.
Why the all-time view matters: a position with a big gap year after year is genuinely scarce; a one-season spike could just be a fluke rookie class or a wave of injuries. If 2025's ranking differs sharply from the all-time ranking, ask whether something structural changed — a scoring tweak, a rule change, a hot/cold position-wide year — before drawing conclusions for next season's draft.
Reading the table. Same columns as the 2025 scarcity table, but averaged across all five seasons. A position whose Scarcity Gap stays large year after year is genuinely scarce; a single big year may be noise.
| Pos | Top-3 Avg | Top-12 Avg | Baseline (bottom-3) | Scarcity Gap | Players Qualified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QB | 32.3 | 30.9 | 12.2 | 18.6 | 45 |
| RB | 12.8 | 11.2 | 0.5 | 10.8 | 100 |
| WR | 11.3 | 10.4 | 0.3 | 10.1 | 109 |
| D/ST | 13.5 | 12.9 | 4.2 | 8.7 | 31 |
| K | 11.0 | 9.9 | 3.1 | 6.8 | 41 |
| TE | 8.8 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 6.0 | 44 |
Top VORP Players (2021–2025)
Per-game VORP = avg starting points − season baseline at that position. Min 5 career starts.
What this is: every qualifying player ranked by per-game VORP, which puts all positions on a single scale. A 12-PPG TE and a 25-PPG QB can rank similarly because they're each that much above their replacement level. Total VORP on the right adds it up across all their starts — useful for spotting 'season MVPs' who racked up edge week after week, not just one or two huge games.
| # | Player | Pos | Starts | Avg Pts | VORP/G | Total VORP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drake Maye | QB | 7 | 32.7 | +22.3 | 155.9 |
| 2 | Sam Darnold | QB | 5 | 31.3 | +20.1 | 100.4 |
| 3 | Drew Brees | QB | 8 | 32.4 | +20.1 | 160.4 |
| 4 | Tom Brady | QB | 36 | 31.8 | +19.4 | 700.1 |
| 5 | Patrick Mahomes | QB | 83 | 31.5 | +19.4 | 1610.0 |
| 6 | Josh Allen | QB | 77 | 31.5 | +19.2 | 1482.0 |
| 7 | Matthew Stafford | QB | 25 | 30.0 | +18.7 | 466.4 |
| 8 | Dak Prescott | QB | 51 | 30.6 | +18.5 | 941.3 |
| 9 | Joe Burrow | QB | 48 | 31.0 | +17.9 | 860.9 |
| 10 | Geno Smith | QB | 16 | 30.4 | +17.1 | 274.1 |
| 11 | Brock Purdy | QB | 26 | 28.7 | +16.5 | 430.0 |
| 12 | Justin Herbert | QB | 53 | 28.1 | +16.2 | 859.2 |
| 13 | Jared Goff | QB | 47 | 28.1 | +15.9 | 748.7 |
| 14 | Deshaun Watson | QB | 17 | 27.9 | +15.4 | 261.4 |
| 15 | Kirk Cousins | QB | 25 | 27.0 | +14.9 | 371.8 |
| 16 | Lamar Jackson | QB | 72 | 27.1 | +14.8 | 1062.9 |
| 17 | Jaxson Dart | QB | 5 | 24.9 | +14.5 | 72.3 |
| 18 | Carson Wentz | QB | 12 | 26.5 | +14.5 | 173.5 |
| 19 | Joe Flacco | QB | 5 | 25.8 | +14.5 | 72.3 |
| 20 | Jalen Hurts | QB | 55 | 26.6 | +14.4 | 789.6 |
| 21 | Russell Wilson | QB | 33 | 26.6 | +14.3 | 472.0 |
| 22 | Trevor Lawrence | QB | 19 | 26.2 | +14.2 | 268.9 |
| 23 | Bo Nix | QB | 7 | 27.3 | +14.0 | 98.2 |
| 24 | Jayden Daniels | QB | 13 | 26.6 | +13.5 | 175.0 |
| 25 | Baker Mayfield | QB | 43 | 25.2 | +13.1 | 565.0 |
What-Ifs — Lineup Construction
Each scenario rebuilds the optimal lineup from every team's actual roster under the alt template. 'Actual' = what teams really scored under the lineup in effect that season. Optimal-under-current isolates the template effect from owners' start/sit decisions.
How to read this: each scenario rebuilds every team-week's optimal lineup from their actual roster under an alternate template. The Δ PPG isolates the template effect — it ignores start/sit decisions, so '+5 PPG' means the change adds 5 points to the ceiling, not necessarily to real outcomes. Use these to debate dropping slots, adding slots, or tweaking scoring before next year's draft.
Current (2025)
Baseline — what the league runs today: 2 flex, no dedicated TE.
Pre-2025 (TE+1F)
Dedicated TE slot + 1 flex — the lineup used 2021–2024.
Drop K
Kicker slot removed, replaced by a third flex.
Drop K + D/ST
Both K and D/ST removed, replaced by two more flexes — modern 'best-ball' style.
+ Superflex
Add a Superflex slot that can also start a 2nd QB.
TE-Premium
Current lineup + 0.5 bonus per TE reception.
| Scenario | Season | Avg Actual | Avg Optimal (this scenario) | Δ PPG vs Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current (2025) | 2019 | 89.9 | 109.5 | +19.6 |
| Current (2025) | 2021 | 89.7 | 104.9 | +15.2 |
| Current (2025) | 2022 | 87.3 | 104.2 | +16.8 |
| Current (2025) | 2023 | 88.3 | 105.0 | +16.7 |
| Current (2025) | 2024 | 93.8 | 111.2 | +17.4 |
| Current (2025) | 2025 | 92.0 | 108.3 | +16.2 |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2019 | 89.9 | 108.6 | +18.7 |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2021 | 89.7 | 104.2 | +14.6 |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2022 | 87.3 | 103.5 | +16.2 |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2023 | 88.3 | 104.3 | +15.9 |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2024 | 93.8 | 110.6 | +16.8 |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2025 | 92.0 | 106.6 | +14.6 |
| Drop K | 2019 | 89.9 | 104.0 | +14.2 |
| Drop K | 2021 | 89.7 | 98.6 | +9.0 |
| Drop K | 2022 | 87.3 | 97.6 | +10.3 |
| Drop K | 2023 | 88.3 | 98.8 | +10.5 |
| Drop K | 2024 | 93.8 | 104.1 | +10.3 |
| Drop K | 2025 | 92.0 | 100.9 | +8.9 |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2019 | 89.9 | 92.6 | +2.7 |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2021 | 89.7 | 87.3 | -2.3 |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2022 | 87.3 | 85.8 | -1.5 |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2023 | 88.3 | 86.5 | -1.8 |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2024 | 93.8 | 92.6 | -1.2 |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2025 | 92.0 | 88.3 | -3.7 |
| + Superflex | 2019 | 89.9 | 125.5 | +35.7 |
| + Superflex | 2021 | 89.7 | 119.5 | +29.8 |
| + Superflex | 2022 | 87.3 | 117.8 | +30.5 |
| + Superflex | 2023 | 88.3 | 118.9 | +30.6 |
| + Superflex | 2024 | 93.8 | 127.4 | +33.6 |
| + Superflex | 2025 | 92.0 | 124.0 | +32.0 |
| TE-Premium | 2019 | 89.9 | 111.7 | +21.9 |
| TE-Premium | 2021 | 89.7 | 107.0 | +17.4 |
| TE-Premium | 2022 | 87.3 | 106.3 | +19.0 |
| TE-Premium | 2023 | 88.3 | 107.3 | +19.0 |
| TE-Premium | 2024 | 93.8 | 113.7 | +19.9 |
| TE-Premium | 2025 | 92.0 | 109.8 | +17.8 |
Regular-Season Outcomes Flipped
How many H2H matchups would have produced a different winner. Doesn't re-seed playoffs.
What this measures: how many head-to-head matchups would have ended differently under each scenario. A low % means the change shifts everyone's scores roughly uniformly — winners stay winners. A high % means the change reshuffles competitive balance, which would also change playoff seeding (though this table doesn't re-seed; it just counts game-by-game flips).
| Scenario | Reg Matchups | Flipped | % Flipped |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current (2025) | 452 | 80 | 17.7% |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 452 | 84 | 18.6% |
| Drop K | 452 | 90 | 19.9% |
| Drop K + D/ST | 452 | 114 | 25.2% |
| + Superflex | 452 | 106 | 23.5% |
| TE-Premium | 452 | 82 | 18.1% |
Championship Game Re-Run
Same playoff bracket, alternate scoring. ✓ = champion changes under this scenario.
What this is: the actual playoff matchups rescored under each scenario's template. ✓ means the title would have changed hands. A scenario that frequently flips championships is making a structural difference, not just adding noise. Caveat: we keep the actual bracket — we don't re-seed playoffs even when the regular-season order would have changed.
| Scenario | Season | Actual Champion | Alt Champion | Actual Score | Alt Score | Changed? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current (2025) | 2019 | Steve Martin | Steve Martin | Steve Martin 120.7 — Sarah Ferguson 99.4 | Steve Martin 133.1 — Sarah Ferguson 103.5 | — |
| Current (2025) | 2021 | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 61.7 | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 75.1 | — |
| Current (2025) | 2022 | Chris Williams | Justin Atkins | Chris Williams 97.2 — Justin Atkins 86.4 | Chris Williams 85.3 — Justin Atkins 101.9 | ✓ |
| Current (2025) | 2023 | William Thompson | William Thompson | Jeremiah Gallagher 103.4 — William Thompson 115.2 | Jeremiah Gallagher 105.3 — William Thompson 115.2 | — |
| Current (2025) | 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | David Freiberger | Sarah Ferguson 123.0 — David Freiberger 121.6 | Sarah Ferguson 125.6 — David Freiberger 133.3 | ✓ |
| Current (2025) | 2025 | David Freiberger | David Freiberger | David Freiberger 104.3 — William Thompson 92.8 | David Freiberger 123.1 — William Thompson 104.5 | — |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2019 | Steve Martin | Steve Martin | Steve Martin 120.7 — Sarah Ferguson 99.4 | Steve Martin 128.6 — Sarah Ferguson 103.5 | — |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2021 | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 61.7 | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 75.1 | — |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2022 | Chris Williams | Justin Atkins | Chris Williams 97.2 — Justin Atkins 86.4 | Chris Williams 85.3 — Justin Atkins 101.9 | ✓ |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2023 | William Thompson | William Thompson | Jeremiah Gallagher 103.4 — William Thompson 115.2 | Jeremiah Gallagher 104.0 — William Thompson 115.2 | — |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | David Freiberger | Sarah Ferguson 123.0 — David Freiberger 121.6 | Sarah Ferguson 125.6 — David Freiberger 130.5 | ✓ |
| Pre-2025 (TE+1F) | 2025 | David Freiberger | David Freiberger | David Freiberger 104.3 — William Thompson 92.8 | David Freiberger 123.1 — William Thompson 104.5 | — |
| Drop K | 2019 | Steve Martin | Steve Martin | Steve Martin 120.7 — Sarah Ferguson 99.4 | Steve Martin 130.0 — Sarah Ferguson 101.7 | — |
| Drop K | 2021 | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 61.7 | Justin Atkins 99.6 — Richard Ferguson 66.0 | — |
| Drop K | 2022 | Chris Williams | Justin Atkins | Chris Williams 97.2 — Justin Atkins 86.4 | Chris Williams 74.5 — Justin Atkins 99.8 | ✓ |
| Drop K | 2023 | William Thompson | William Thompson | Jeremiah Gallagher 103.4 — William Thompson 115.2 | Jeremiah Gallagher 95.5 — William Thompson 111.0 | — |
| Drop K | 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | David Freiberger | Sarah Ferguson 123.0 — David Freiberger 121.6 | Sarah Ferguson 114.9 — David Freiberger 137.1 | ✓ |
| Drop K | 2025 | David Freiberger | David Freiberger | David Freiberger 104.3 — William Thompson 92.8 | David Freiberger 110.0 — William Thompson 99.9 | — |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2019 | Steve Martin | Steve Martin | Steve Martin 120.7 — Sarah Ferguson 99.4 | Steve Martin 114.0 — Sarah Ferguson 78.8 | — |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2021 | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 61.7 | Justin Atkins 78.1 — Richard Ferguson 63.8 | — |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2022 | Chris Williams | Justin Atkins | Chris Williams 97.2 — Justin Atkins 86.4 | Chris Williams 58.4 — Justin Atkins 83.8 | ✓ |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2023 | William Thompson | William Thompson | Jeremiah Gallagher 103.4 — William Thompson 115.2 | Jeremiah Gallagher 81.4 — William Thompson 100.8 | — |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | David Freiberger | Sarah Ferguson 123.0 — David Freiberger 121.6 | Sarah Ferguson 92.9 — David Freiberger 140.9 | ✓ |
| Drop K + D/ST | 2025 | David Freiberger | David Freiberger | David Freiberger 104.3 — William Thompson 92.8 | David Freiberger 100.6 — William Thompson 92.3 | — |
| + Superflex | 2019 | Steve Martin | Steve Martin | Steve Martin 120.7 — Sarah Ferguson 99.4 | Steve Martin 152.9 — Sarah Ferguson 124.9 | — |
| + Superflex | 2021 | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 61.7 | Justin Atkins 106.6 — Richard Ferguson 97.4 | — |
| + Superflex | 2022 | Chris Williams | Justin Atkins | Chris Williams 97.2 — Justin Atkins 86.4 | Chris Williams 87.5 — Justin Atkins 111.8 | ✓ |
| + Superflex | 2023 | William Thompson | William Thompson | Jeremiah Gallagher 103.4 — William Thompson 115.2 | Jeremiah Gallagher 118.4 — William Thompson 140.9 | — |
| + Superflex | 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | David Freiberger | Sarah Ferguson 123.0 — David Freiberger 121.6 | Sarah Ferguson 153.5 — David Freiberger 154.2 | ✓ |
| + Superflex | 2025 | David Freiberger | William Thompson | David Freiberger 104.3 — William Thompson 92.8 | David Freiberger 125.0 — William Thompson 127.1 | ✓ |
| TE-Premium | 2019 | Steve Martin | Steve Martin | Steve Martin 120.7 — Sarah Ferguson 99.4 | Steve Martin 133.1 — Sarah Ferguson 107.0 | — |
| TE-Premium | 2021 | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins | Justin Atkins 104.7 — Richard Ferguson 61.7 | Justin Atkins 106.5 — Richard Ferguson 78.1 | — |
| TE-Premium | 2022 | Chris Williams | Justin Atkins | Chris Williams 97.2 — Justin Atkins 86.4 | Chris Williams 88.8 — Justin Atkins 103.4 | ✓ |
| TE-Premium | 2023 | William Thompson | William Thompson | Jeremiah Gallagher 103.4 — William Thompson 115.2 | Jeremiah Gallagher 106.0 — William Thompson 119.8 | — |
| TE-Premium | 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | David Freiberger | Sarah Ferguson 123.0 — David Freiberger 121.6 | Sarah Ferguson 131.6 — David Freiberger 133.3 | ✓ |
| TE-Premium | 2025 | David Freiberger | David Freiberger | David Freiberger 104.3 — William Thompson 92.8 | David Freiberger 124.1 — William Thompson 106.0 | — |
Median Scoring — Alternate W-L Records
Each owner gets a 2nd W/L per week based on whether they outscored the league median. Tracks how unlucky owners (high scores, low wins) would have done.
How to read this: the Median column shows what each owner's record would be if every week they got a W for scoring above the league median (a L for below). The H2H column shows their actual record; the gap reveals schedule luck. A median W meaningfully higher than the H2H W = unlucky owner who scored well but kept drawing the highest-scoring opponent. The Combined column is what their record looks like under a 'H2H + median' format some leagues use.
| Season | Owner | Actual H2H | Median (above/below) | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Chris Williams | 8-4 | 8-4 | 16-8 |
| 2019 | David Freiberger | 5-7 | 7-5 | 12-12 |
| 2019 | David McMillen | 3-9 | 3-9 | 6-18 |
| 2019 | Jeremiah Gallagher | 8-4 | 9-3 | 17-7 |
| 2019 | Jessica Freiberger | 6-6 | 5-7 | 11-13 |
| 2019 | KCC Flick | 0-0 | 5-7 | 5-7 |
| 2019 | Kelly Flick | 5-7 | 0-0 | 5-7 |
| 2019 | Richard Ferguson | 5-7 | 4-8 | 9-15 |
| 2019 | Roger Flick | 6-6 | 6-6 | 12-12 |
| 2019 | Sarah Ferguson | 7-5 | 7-5 | 14-10 |
| 2019 | Steve Martin | 7-5 | 6-6 | 13-11 |
| 2021 | Chris Medawar | 4-10 | 4-10 | 8-20 |
| 2021 | Chris Williams | 6-8 | 5-9 | 11-17 |
| 2021 | David Freiberger | 9-5 | 9-5 | 18-10 |
| 2021 | Doran East | 11-3 | 11-3 | 22-6 |
| 2021 | Jeremiah Gallagher | 7-7 | 3-11 | 10-18 |
| 2021 | Jessica Freiberger | 6-8 | 7-7 | 13-15 |
| 2021 | Justin Atkins | 10-4 | 9-5 | 19-9 |
| 2021 | KCC Flick | 4-10 | 4-10 | 8-20 |
| 2021 | Richard Ferguson | 7-7 | 9-5 | 16-12 |
| 2021 | Roger Flick | 6-8 | 6-8 | 12-16 |
| 2021 | Sarah Ferguson | 5-9 | 9-5 | 14-14 |
| 2021 | William Thompson | 9-5 | 8-6 | 17-11 |
| 2022 | Chris Medawar | 9-5 | 12-2 | 21-7 |
| 2022 | Chris Williams | 8-6 | 8-6 | 16-12 |
| 2022 | David Freiberger | 11-3 | 8-6 | 19-9 |
| 2022 | Doran East | 7-7 | 9-5 | 16-12 |
| 2022 | Jeremiah Gallagher | 3-11 | 2-12 | 5-23 |
| 2022 | Jessica Freiberger | 8-6 | 8-6 | 16-12 |
| 2022 | Justin Atkins | 8-6 | 8-6 | 16-12 |
| 2022 | KCC Flick | 6-8 | 7-7 | 13-15 |
| 2022 | Richard Ferguson | 6-8 | 6-8 | 12-16 |
| 2022 | Roger Flick | 5-9 | 6-8 | 11-17 |
| 2022 | Sarah Ferguson | 8-6 | 5-9 | 13-15 |
| 2022 | William Thompson | 5-9 | 5-9 | 10-18 |
| 2023 | Chris Medawar | 10-4 | 9-5 | 19-9 |
| 2023 | Chris Williams | 7-7 | 5-9 | 12-16 |
| 2023 | Cole Flick | 8-6 | 8-6 | 16-12 |
| 2023 | David Freiberger | 4-10 | 6-8 | 10-18 |
| 2023 | Doran East | 7-7 | 8-6 | 15-13 |
| 2023 | Jeremiah Gallagher | 9-5 | 8-6 | 17-11 |
| 2023 | Jessica Freiberger | 10-4 | 8-6 | 18-10 |
| 2023 | Justin Atkins | 3-11 | 1-13 | 4-24 |
| 2023 | Richard Ferguson | 6-8 | 7-7 | 13-15 |
| 2023 | Roger Flick | 4-10 | 8-6 | 12-16 |
| 2023 | Sarah Ferguson | 7-7 | 9-5 | 16-12 |
| 2023 | William Thompson | 9-5 | 7-7 | 16-12 |
| 2024 | Chris Williams | 8-6 | 7-6-1 | 15-12 |
| 2024 | Cole Flick | 6-8 | 7-5-2 | 13-13 |
| 2024 | David Freiberger | 17-11 | 7-6-1 | 24-17 |
| 2024 | Doran East | 7-7 | 4-8-2 | 11-15 |
| 2024 | Jeremiah Gallagher | 6-8 | 9-5 | 15-13 |
| 2024 | Jessica Freiberger | 6-8 | 4-8-2 | 10-16 |
| 2024 | Justin Atkins | 7-7 | 6-6-2 | 13-13 |
| 2024 | Richard Ferguson | 5-9 | 5-9 | 10-18 |
| 2024 | Roger Flick | 6-8 | 5-7-2 | 11-15 |
| 2024 | Sarah Ferguson | 10-4 | 7-5-2 | 17-9 |
| 2024 | William Thompson | 6-8 | 9-5 | 15-13 |
| 2025 | Chris Williams | 9-5 | 9-3-2 | 18-8 |
| 2025 | Cole Flick | 2-12 | 3-10-1 | 5-22 |
| 2025 | David Freiberger | 19-9 | 5-7-2 | 24-16 |
| 2025 | Doran East | 8-6 | 8-5-1 | 16-11 |
| 2025 | Jeremiah Gallagher | 4-10 | 6-7-1 | 10-17 |
| 2025 | Jessica Freiberger | 5-9 | 5-7-2 | 10-16 |
| 2025 | Justin Atkins | 10-4 | 10-3-1 | 20-7 |
| 2025 | Richard Ferguson | 7-7 | 6-7-1 | 13-14 |
| 2025 | Roger Flick | 8-6 | 5-7-2 | 13-13 |
| 2025 | Sarah Ferguson | 5-9 | 5-8-1 | 10-17 |
| 2025 | William Thompson | 7-7 | 7-6-1 | 14-13 |